Europeans spend 575 million hours per year clicking cookie consent banners. That’s the equivalent of 65,000 full-time employees doing nothing but clicking “accept” all day, every day. And here’s the uncomfortable reality: fewer than 15% of the top 10,000 European websites are actually GDPR-compliant with their cookie consent (Bruegel, 2025).
The regulation created annoyance. It didn’t create safety.
What Cookie Regulation Was Supposed to Do
The ePrivacy Directive of 2002 had good intentions. Third-party advertising networks were tracking people across the internet without consent. The law required websites to ask permission before storing cookies on user devices.
Then GDPR arrived in 2018, adding stricter consent requirements. Suddenly every website needed banners with equally prominent “accept” and “reject” buttons. The goal: give users control over their data.
The reality? “People are so used to cookie banners, they just click whatever just to move on.” (Simple Analytics, 2025)
That’s consent fatigue in action. When you see the same pop-up on every website, multiple times per day, the rational response is to make it disappear as fast as possible. The “protection” becomes an obstacle to navigate, not a decision to consider.
The Compliance Gap Nobody Talks About
If cookie laws worked, you’d expect high compliance rates. The numbers tell a different story.
Fewer than 15% of the top 10,000 European websites deploy cookie consent banners that are fully GDPR-compliant. That’s not a typo. Seven years after GDPR, more than 85% of major sites still get it wrong.
You may be interested in: Cookie Consent 2026: When Your Own Analytics Are Exempt
Common violations include: hidden reject buttons, pre-checked consent boxes, confusing language, and “legitimate interest” claims that bypass consent entirely. The sites know the rules. They just found creative interpretations.
CNIL (France’s data protection authority) has issued cookie consent fines ranging from €8 million to €150 million for major violators including Google, Meta, and Amazon (McDermott Will & Emery, 2024). But those fines are rounding errors for companies worth hundreds of billions.
Meanwhile, small businesses face the same compliance requirements without the legal teams to navigate loopholes or the revenue to absorb fines.
The Regulation That Never Arrived
The ePrivacy Regulation was supposed to fix everything. Proposed in 2017, it would have modernized the 2002 Directive with clearer rules for the cookie-consent era.
Seven years of negotiations later, the European Commission formally withdrew it in February 2025 (Secure Privacy, 2025).
The law that was supposed to replace cookie banners with browser-level settings—where you’d set your preferences once and websites would respect them—died in committee. Instead, we get another decade of pop-ups.
As Linklaters noted in December 2024: “The impact of the ePrivacy Directive has been just as great as the GDPR given it is the progenitor of the endless and annoying cookie banners.”
The EU now wants to address this through different reforms. The European Commission claims 50% of private websites and 80% of public websites wouldn’t need cookie banners under proposed changes (Bruegel, 2025). But after watching the ePrivacy Regulation fail for seven years, optimism about quick reform seems misplaced.
What the Regulation Actually Targeted
Here’s what gets lost in the compliance theater: cookie regulation was meant to stop cross-site surveillance advertising, not your store’s shopping cart.
You may be interested in: EU Digital Omnibus 2026: The Cookie Consent Reform That Changes Everything
The problem was third-party cookies following people across the internet, building profiles without consent, then selling that data to advertisers. That shoe ad that follows you everywhere? That’s what regulations were trying to stop.
But the implementation treated all cookies the same:
- Third-party tracking cookies: Follow you across websites, build profiles, sell your data—the actual problem
- First-party analytics cookies: Tell you how many people visited your site—caught in the crossfire
- Session cookies: Remember your shopping cart for 30 minutes—also caught in the crossfire
A WooCommerce store using first-party cookies to track purchases on their own site faces the same consent requirements as an ad network tracking people across thousands of sites. That’s not proportional regulation.
Where Tracking Actually Went
While small businesses struggled with consent banners, sophisticated trackers moved to fingerprinting—collecting browser attributes, screen resolution, and device characteristics to identify users without cookies.
Fingerprinting doesn’t require consent under current interpretations. The UK ICO called Google’s December 2024 fingerprinting policy “irresponsible,” but enforcement is years behind the technology.
The regulation’s unintended consequence: it made compliant first-party tracking harder while doing little to stop the surveillance it targeted. Businesses that play by the rules face consent friction. Those willing to use shadier techniques skip the banners entirely.
The First-Party Path Forward
Here’s what cookie regulation should have protected: businesses collecting their own customer data with proper consent for legitimate purposes.
When a customer buys from your WooCommerce store, you need to know:
- Which marketing channel brought them
- What they purchased
- How to attribute that sale to your ad spend
That’s not surveillance. That’s running a business. And it doesn’t require tracking anyone across the internet—just connecting the customer’s information (which they provide at checkout) to the ad click that brought them.
Transmute Engine™ takes this approach. It’s a first-party Node.js server running on your subdomain that captures WooCommerce events and routes them to GA4, Facebook CAPI, and Google Ads. No third-party tracking. No fingerprinting. Just legitimate first-party data with proper consent—what the regulation intended without the complexity that drives non-compliance.
Key Takeaways
- 575 million hours per year spent clicking cookie banners in Europe
- Under 15% of top European sites are fully GDPR-compliant with cookie consent
- ePrivacy Regulation was withdrawn in February 2025 after seven years of failed negotiations
- Small businesses bear compliance costs while big tech finds workarounds
- First-party server-side tracking achieves what regulation intended without the complexity
The evidence suggests not meaningfully. Fewer than 15% of top European websites are fully compliant, most users click “accept” without reading, and real trackers moved to fingerprinting which is harder to control.
Cookie banners come from the ePrivacy Directive (2002), not GDPR directly. GDPR sets the consent standards, but the banner requirement is from the older “cookie law.”
The EU is considering reforms. The European Commission claims 50% of private and 80% of public websites wouldn’t need banners under proposed changes that move consent to browser settings.
Compliance requires consent management tools, legal review, and ongoing maintenance. Big tech can afford teams to find workarounds. Small businesses either pay for compliance or risk fines.
Want compliant tracking without the complexity? Seresa’s first-party approach delivers what cookie regulation intended—legitimate data collection with proper consent.
